Britain Doesn't Have an Inequality Problem
Is UK wealth inequality actually rising? Wes Streeting calls inequality "the fracture running through modern Britain", and the coming budget leans on the same story. Neil Woodford has spent weeks in the data, and it says something very different.
In this episode, Neil and Jon work through what the official numbers show: the top 10 percent's share of British wealth was 56 percent in 1980 and 57 percent four decades later, flat through the biggest asset boom in the country's history. They explain why compounding means wealth gaps should widen automatically, and what cancelled it: the occupational pension revolution, faster pay growth at the bottom, and a tax system where the top 1 percent of earners now pay 28 percent of all income tax.
Then the measurement problem. The gap between Britain's richest and poorest fifth is 12 to 1 before taxes and benefits, and 3.3 to 1 after. Same country, same year, same statisticians. Which number you get quoted depends on who is quoting it.
Finally: does inequality actually damage growth? Neil's answer, and what it means for the tax rises now being floated ahead of the budget.
More episodes
Why Neil Woodford Won’t Buy the Anthropic IPO
The Anthropic IPO is weeks away, and its filing shows a business like no other: $17bn of sales in three months, still a loss, and $895bn signed away on computing power. Neil Woodford goes through the numbers and asks who actually keeps the profit from AI.
Show notesBritain Can Grow Its Way Out of This Budget
Budget 2026 raised the tax on your savings and rental income, on top of a rise already due in April, and the Chancellor barely mentioned it. Neil Woodford explains why John Healey did it, and why he thinks the official forecast that says more tax rises are coming is wrong.
Show notesThe AI Boom Is Only in the Foothills
AI stocks sold off hard last week, and the Financial Times called it a dress rehearsal for an AI reckoning. Is the AI bubble about to burst? Neil Woodford thinks the AI boom is only in the foothills, but he has a clear view on who is holding the risk if it doesn’t pay for itself.
Show notesGo deeper than the podcast
Access the strategies, research, and real-time portfolio data behind the conversations.